First, read "the radicalization of Zeke Speir" under course documents. Zeke (his real name) became radicalized by his experience with the police when he attempted to engage in political activism. The story here is positive and optimistic: the Internet facilitates democracy and creates new forms of social capital (defined as the degree of engagement with others to achieve social goals that add value to society). Be sure to read the counterargument, summarized on p. 103, that the Internet leads to the decline of social capital and therefore undercuts democracy. Some things to consider:
1. What does the author mean by "new forms of social capital?" What are these new forms? How do they differ from creating social capital the old fashioned way, i.e., face to face?
2. This article recounts activities from 1999-2000. What can you find out about social movements, political activism and the Internet today?
3. During his presidential campaign, Barack Obama was next the first candidate to really "get" the potential for social networks, blogs and websites and also the production of content by users for making a run for the president into a social movement. Google various Obama web sites, including "MyBarackObama.com", to see how he structured online activities to create a grassroots political movement (leave aside for the moment how you think he's doing so far as president; the focus here is on the 2008 campaign). In what sense is this different from, or similar to, the use of the Internet which got Zeke involved in that social movement (also google "zeke speir" to see what he's doing now).
4. Google "opposition to Obama" to see how the political right is using feelings about Obama to generate a right-wing social movement. Are there any differences or similarities to Speir or Obama, circa 2008?
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Monday, September 7, 2009
The development of romantic relationships online
Hi Cyberfriends! By now you have received an email from me to which is attached an interview done by my research assistant, Elisa Wiherin, some years ago. The interview is of a woman who was a student at the time and agreed to share her experiences falling in love online and then what transpired in the relationship. The names of the two principals are changed but they have given me their permission to share the interview with others. I suggest that you print out the interview to work with it. Attached to that email is also a website called Cyberlove101, stories from, and interviews with, people who met and fell in love online. Story 21 is illustrative. As you'd expect, many of the stories are positive but some are not. See if you can draw people's attention to both.
Here are some questions to start you off. As usual, you answer these or create your own questions:
1. There is no doubt that Alexis falls in love online. But what does that mean? What does love mean for Alexis and what is it about the chat room environment that might facilitate this love relationship?
2. This is an example of a relationship in which the people, feeling strongly attracted to each other online, exchange pictures, phone calls and finally meet f2f. This is one end of a spectrum, the other end of which would be people who fall in love online but maint their love relationship entirely online, only relating through text. What might be the differences in "love" for this hypothetical couple as opposed to the case study examples?
3. Based on her responses, what kind of person do you think Alexis is? How might your interpretation of her as a person explain why she fell in love and how she behaved both in the lead up to the face to face meeting and during the first meeting?
4. You have spent some considerable effort thinking about the nature of personhood online. How are insights you exchanged with each other (and the reading) related to thinking about relationships?
5. What are the similarities and differences between falling in love online and falling in love offline? From the evidence in these case studies and your own experience, do you think there is little difference, some difference or a lot of difference between online and offline relationship formation and why?
Good luck; keep the conversation going!
Dr. Bob
Here are some questions to start you off. As usual, you answer these or create your own questions:
1. There is no doubt that Alexis falls in love online. But what does that mean? What does love mean for Alexis and what is it about the chat room environment that might facilitate this love relationship?
2. This is an example of a relationship in which the people, feeling strongly attracted to each other online, exchange pictures, phone calls and finally meet f2f. This is one end of a spectrum, the other end of which would be people who fall in love online but maint their love relationship entirely online, only relating through text. What might be the differences in "love" for this hypothetical couple as opposed to the case study examples?
3. Based on her responses, what kind of person do you think Alexis is? How might your interpretation of her as a person explain why she fell in love and how she behaved both in the lead up to the face to face meeting and during the first meeting?
4. You have spent some considerable effort thinking about the nature of personhood online. How are insights you exchanged with each other (and the reading) related to thinking about relationships?
5. What are the similarities and differences between falling in love online and falling in love offline? From the evidence in these case studies and your own experience, do you think there is little difference, some difference or a lot of difference between online and offline relationship formation and why?
Good luck; keep the conversation going!
Dr. Bob
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)